Dating Churches


The search and call process is a lot like dating. They call, you talk, you interview (date) and then you wait. Are they going to call back? Is it too soon for me to call and follow up? Do you talk to all your girl/boy/close-clergy-friends about the other party and worry while you wait?

With our profile systems in place in many of our mainline churches, it is a lot like internet dating. You read a candidate’s profile or the candidate reads the churches profile.  You see if your interests and hobbies (or values and theology) match up.  You make a decision whether to take the next step and contact the other party.  And from there, it is like going on a blind date.  Sometimes you even get set up by a good friend (or retired minister who knows you and knows the congregation).  Both my husband and I have recently accepted calls to new ministries, and both of us had a few prior experiences in the call process in which it was a lot like dating, and some of them were bad dates.

Several years ago, we experienced a situation in which we had an interview together for a church, the feeling of the interview seemed positive and upbeat—and then we never heard from the church again. No follow-up emails, no calls, even after a month when I sent a follow-up email to ask about the search process.  We learned from the regional minister months later that the church had called someone else to be their pastor.

A few years back, I was contacted by a church and asked to reply via email if I was interested.  I did, and then waited a month and heard nothing. When I made a follow-up phone call, it was discovered my email had gone into the chair’s spam mailbox.  So they scrambled to set up an interview, but it seemed doomed from the start.  After having what I felt was a good initial interview, I was told I would hear in a few weeks.  Again, after a month, I decided it was time to follow up with an email which went unanswered.  So I followed up with an email from another account and once again, my previous email had gone into the spam mailbox.  I received a reply that they had mailed me a letter stating they were going with a different candidate (via the USPS) but I never received it, nor did I receive back the DVD’s of my sermons that I was told would be returned to me.

Lastly, in a church search I participated in earlier this year, I had once again a wonderful initial phone call and email conversation, a great interview, and was told I would hear back “very soon.”  I waited and waited. This was a search committee I really felt connected with.  I decided to send a follow-up email thanking them for the interview and looking forward to hearing their response.  Another two weeks passed, and I sent another email.  Then it was two months, and by that point, I knew they had probably moved on, but I sent one last email just to check, and received an email back that they had already called a new minister.

While I share strictly from my point of view, having been the potential candidate in this dating process, I know that sometimes candidates are not stellar partners, either.  I know of candidates who have strung one church along as a “plan B” while courting their dream church, leaving the church at the end of the process (as in, calling two days before the candidate was supposed to preach and be voted on to say they had decided to go another direction and were no longer interested).  I know of candidates who have been hard to contact.  It goes both ways.

But there are good matches out there.  If we are committed to the online dating/search-and-call process, we need to be better with our standards for communication.  Check your spam boxes. Check your grammar on your introductory emails. When you decide to make a rejection, please don’t send a canned response—take a minute or two to share prayers for the continued search process-at least try to make it personal rather than a form letter.  And most of all, when you are not sure about a candidate or have two good potential candidates, do not keep the other candidate waiting long (and the same goes for a candidate with two churches—do not keep them waiting long, and do not string them along with false hopes).

The online profile systems of most mainline search-and-call processes are a lot like dating. They are not perfect. They work for some churches and candidates but not all.  Some of the best matches happen because someone knows someone else (and some of the worst happen that way, too).  But the system can be improved by better faithfulness in communication by both parties.  And sometimes, it really is love at first sight—sometimes it is in that initial interview you know it is just going to work out.  Despite our fears and misgivings, sometimes God really can work through our human processes—and sometimes God works outside of them, too.

Happy matchmaking!

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized by Rev. Mindi. Bookmark the permalink.

About Rev. Mindi

Rev. Mindi Welton-Mitchell is an ordained American Baptist minister married to an ordained Disciples of Christ minister and mother of a child with autism. Mindi grew up in Alaska, lived in Oregon, Massachusetts and Oklahoma, and now lives in the Seattle area. She is a pastor, creator of Rev-o-lution (http://rev-o-lution.org), retreat leader and writer, and a citizen of Red Sox Nation. (Note that her posts are her personal views and do not necessarily represent the views of her congregation).

2 thoughts on “Dating Churches

  1. Thanks for this, Mindi. I’ve gone through the “date” process in two denominations, and my experience is very similar to yours. However, I think that, as a Disciple, there should be one caveat. Yes, the Search and Call process among Disciples is very much like online dating, expect with Disciples only one party, the church, can see who is looking.

    When I first entered Search and Call, I contacted DHM to inquire why I was only seeing 3 ministry listings. I thought something was wrong with my circulation status. Nope. That’s all that was posted on the national site. Many churches were looking, however, but only three listings had been posted by their regions. For candidates who desire to engage in a national search process, it’s almost impossible to know of all the congregations currently in the search process. As of today, there is ZERO listings on the national site. Some regional websites have openings posted on their site, and for others you have to dig through newsletters to find them. Many have no information. Some regional and area ministers are eager to give you a list when you email and ask. Others do not. Some don’t respond to your email at all, given that their workload is very great and their support staff often small or non-existent. However, any Disciples congregation engaging in the search process can choose to have access to profiles of everyone currently in database.

    As a contrast, anyone can currently download the entire list of UCC churches that are looking, right from the national UCC site. As an ordained Disciples minister, I have greater knowledge of UCC congregations currently searching for ministers than I do of fellow DOC congregations.

    This process is hard enough, for both churches and for ministers. In order to ensure that the door is open, that the process is transparent, and that ministers and churches are at equal footing, I would love to see the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) strongly encourage, if not insist, that all regional ministries post on the search and call database all churches currently looking. I’m not suggesting that Regional Ministers are intentionally subverting the process–by no means. And I am not devaluing the important, necessary role that regional ministers play in Search and Call. Their role, I believe, should remain the same, as they shepherd the process. Ministers searching should not be allowed to contact churches directly, but they should at least know who is looking. The process is good, but it needs a little tweaking and such changes can be, for all parties involved, a huge improvement. But thanks be to God that God can work in and through and in spite of our flawed systems.

  2. Pingback: The Stained Glass Ceiling | [D]mergent

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s